Critique of a Political Speech of Barack Obama Essay

Critique of a Political Speech of Barack Obama - Essay ExampleThis research will father with the statement that the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency of the United States stands as a greatly significant and meaningful result for contemporary America. His inaugural speech given on January 21st 2009 reads as a missive to both Americans and contains within it the classically American mlange of Christian-style preaching and the Enlightenment era ideas so important to the soils heritage life, liberty, and equality. With respect to the course, the researcher believes that Obamas speech touches upon, among other things, key elements of Americana which appertain to its heritage, its self-imagery, and its universalist claims of equality and liberty for all. In doing so, Obama employs pathos, ethos, and logos interchangeably so as to endow his words with the role that they deem. It is debatable which of the three forms of rhetorical appeal are most effective to begin a speech. E ach, depending on circumstance, can serve to capture the attention of the audience. Obama opts for a blend of pathos and ethos. He opens with My fellow citizens I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust youve bestowed, evocative of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. The pathos of self-imposed modesty and trust easily transitions to the ethos of ancestors. Ancestors begins an appeal to the ethos of the American Republic and its ideals. He manages the transition well as he then refers to an America which has carried on not simply because of the scientific discipline or vision of those in high office, simply because we, the people, have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears and true to our founding documents. / So it has been so it must be with this generation of Americans. (Obama 2009)This blending of pathos and ethos is quite effective. Without yet having to employ the trammel tool of logos, Obama is able to allude to an historical na tion and the sentiments of its people. Logic and consistency might demand that integrity point out that in fact America has not always held true to its founding documents, the cosmos of slavery for many years, the mistreatment of the Native American, and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War Two being but more or less notable examples to the contrary. But this is rhetoric, not reality. The brief sojourn into ethos is then temporarily abandoned for a return to pathos. What other recent event, scored into the memory of every American, has the ability to evoke an emotional response without break in September 11, 2001 of course. The other sources of emotional upheaval at the moment (in 2009 and now) is the ongoing global economic crisis and to a lesser extent, environmental degradation and healthcare. Obama makes use of all three.Our nation is at war against a far-reaching net income of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and i rresponsibility on the part of some.Our health care is too costly, our schools fail too many -- and each day brings further record that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet. (Obama 2009)It is interesting that a man who is facing a crisis as serious as that faced by FDR generations prior, appeals to the sense of unease and fear that many hold. Apparently, we have more to fear than fear itself. International terrorism, failing economy, and an inefficient healthcare system are things to use up about. This is pure and unbridled pathos. But in the end, Obamas talent for speaking remains unblemished as he, after making appeals to fear-based concerns, reassures his audience, in true Rooseveltian fashion, that we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord